Long Strangle
A long strangle is an options strategy that buys an out-of-the-money call and an out-of-the-money put, aiming to profit from a large move in either direction, but the stock still has to move far enough to overcome the total premium paid.
A long strangle is an options strategy that aims to profit from a large move in a stock, whether that move is up or down.
It is built by buying one call option and one put option with the same expiration date but different strike prices.
Like a long straddle, this strategy focuses more on movement than direction. The difference is that the call and put are usually bought out of the money, which often lowers the upfront cost but also requires a bigger move to become profitable by expiration.
What Is a Long Strangle?
A long strangle is a long volatility strategy. In plain English, that means the trader wants a strong move in either direction and does not need to predict which way the stock will go.
The position has two parts:
buy one out-of-the-money call option
buy one out-of-the-money put option
Both options use the same expiration date, but the call strike is above the current stock price and the put strike is below it.
Because the trader buys both options, the position begins with a net debit. That means the trader pays premium up front to open the trade.
When Traders Use a Long Strangle
Traders often use a long strangle when they expect a large move but are uncertain about direction. This can happen before earnings, major company announcements, legal decisions, or important economic releases.
The strategy may appeal to traders who want a volatility-based trade with a lower upfront cost than a long straddle. In exchange for that lower cost, they accept that the stock must move farther before the trade becomes profitable at expiration.
In many cases, a long strangle is considered when:
a major event could create a sharp move
the trader wants upside and downside exposure
the trader prefers cheaper entry than a straddle, even if break-even levels are wider
That tradeoff is central to the strategy. A lower entry cost sounds attractive, but it comes with a higher movement requirement.
How a Long Strangle Makes or Loses Money
The best-case outcome is that the stock makes a very large move before expiration. If the stock rises sharply, the long call may gain value quickly. If the stock falls sharply, the long put may gain value quickly.
The worst-case outcome is that the stock stays between the two strike prices through expiration. In that case, both options may expire worthless, and the trader can lose the entire premium paid.
The basic payoff profile looks like this:
maximum loss is the total premium paid for both options
profit potential can be large on either side if the move is strong enough
there are two break-even points based on the call strike plus total premium and the put strike minus total premium
This is one reason long strangles can disappoint beginners. Even if the stock moves noticeably, the trade may still lose money if the move is not large enough or if time decay erodes the option values too quickly.
A Simple Long Strangle Example
Imagine a stock is trading at $100. A trader expects a large move after an upcoming event but does not want to choose a direction.
They open a long strangle like this:
buy one $105 call for $2.50
buy one $95 put for $2.00
This creates a total debit of $4.50, or $450 per strangle, since one options contract usually controls 100 shares.
The break-even prices at expiration are:
$105 + $4.50 = $109.50 on the upside
$95 - $4.50 = $90.50 on the downside
That means:
if the stock finishes above $109.50 at expiration, the trade may be profitable
if the stock finishes below $90.50 at expiration, the trade may be profitable
if the stock stays between those prices, the trade may lose some or all of the premium paid
if the stock stays between $95 and $105, both options may expire worthless and the full $450 can be lost
Main Risks and Tradeoffs
The main attraction of a long strangle is lower cost compared with a long straddle. But that lower cost comes with important tradeoffs.
The move must be even larger. Because both options are out of the money, the stock usually has to move farther than it would for a straddle to reach profitability at expiration.
Time decay still hurts. The trader owns two options, so passing time without a large move can work against the position.
Implied volatility matters. If implied volatility falls after a major event, both options can lose value quickly.
The full debit can still be lost. Even though the trade may cost less than a straddle, the entire premium paid remains at risk.
Event pricing can already be expensive. Markets often anticipate big events, so the options may already reflect high movement expectations.
A common beginner mistake is assuming that a cheaper volatility trade is automatically a better one. Lower cost does not always mean better odds.
Who It May Fit and Who Should Be Cautious
A long strangle may fit traders who expect unusually large movement and want a lower-cost alternative to a long straddle.
It may be more appropriate for traders who already understand:
calls and puts
break-even points
time decay
implied volatility
Beginners should be cautious because the strategy can still lose money even when the stock moves. If the move is too small, happens too slowly, or comes with a drop in implied volatility, the trade may disappoint.
Final Takeaway
A long strangle is an options strategy that buys an out-of-the-money call and an out-of-the-money put to profit from a large move in either direction. Traders often use it when they want volatility exposure with a lower upfront cost than a long straddle.
But the lower entry cost comes with a tradeoff: the stock usually has to move farther for the trade to work. That means beginners should focus not just on cost, but on the size and timing of the move needed to overcome the total premium paid.
Before using a long strangle, it helps to understand that being right about “more movement” is not always enough. The movement has to be large enough, fast enough, and favorable enough for the trade structure.