By Nathan Williams Published Updated Options Analysis

QCOM Options Outlook: Will $160 Hold Through September 4?

The options market is pricing QCOM in a $155.77–$172.61 band into the September 4 expiration, with the heaviest put open interest parked at $160 and the call wall at $170. Here's what the flow shows, where the technical read disagrees, and three defined-risk ways to trade the range.

QCOM Options Outlook: Will $160 Hold Through September 4?

The options market implies a $155.77–$172.61 range into the September 4 expiration; here's what's driving it and three defined-risk ways to trade it.

Published Saturday, August 29, 2026 · Data as of the 2026-08-28 close

Explore the live QCOM options data in the Detailed Options Analyzer →

Quick answer

ItemAnswer
Market biasNeutral
Options-implied range (into Sept 4)$155.77 – $172.61 (±5.13%)
Major support$160 (Sept 4 put wall and max pain)
Major resistance$170 (Sept 4 call wall)
Max pain (Sept 4)$160
Dealer gamma regime (estimate)Positive — hedging tends to dampen moves; flip level ≈ $95, far below spot
Volatility conditionFalling — IV rank 21/100 · premium fair: options priced about 0.03 vol points above delivered movement
Next earningsNovember 4 (after close) — beyond every expiration quoted here
Technical checkMixed (bullish, 3-day and 6-day models)
Best-fitting strategyIron condor with short strikes outside the expected-move rails
Analysis invalidated ifQCOM closes below $160

1 · What matters today

QCOM closed at $164.19 and the options market is pricing a move of roughly $8.42 up or down — about ±5.1% — through the September 4 expiration. That's the move the options market is pricing in, derived from what straddles cost. Our read of the flow lands squarely neutral: the leading positioning composite is flat, short-dated sentiment is barely negative, and the only genuinely one-sided reading is skew — puts are running about 1.2 vol points over equivalent calls when this name's own norm has been calls carrying the premium.

The map is simple. Heaviest put open interest for this expiration sits at $160, which is also where max pain lands; heaviest call open interest sits at $170. That's a $10 corridor with spot near the middle. A close below $160 kills this read. Both technical models we checked lean modestly bullish inside that corridor — a tilt the flow does not confirm.

2 · What the options market is pricing

What changed this week

The stock added 2.14% over the last five sessions and 11.16% over the last twenty, and option prices came down as it did. At-the-money implied volatility — the market's estimate of how much QCOM will move, baked into option prices — printed 39.1%, down 5.6% on the day, 3.7% over five sessions, and a striking 46.5% over the last thirty snapshots. That leaves it far under its own 30-day average of 54.5% and 90-day average of 65.9%.

Flow turned sharply call-heavy on the final session. Put volume ran at just 0.26 contracts for every call, against a 14-day average of 0.61 and a 7-day average of 0.57 — an unusually call-tilted day even by this stock's own standards. Open interest tells a slower story: 175,597 puts against 170,888 calls, a ratio of 1.03 versus a 14-day average of 0.89, meaning the standing book still carries slightly more downside than upside contracts even as new money chased calls. The largest single open-interest build in the live chain was the October 16 $190 calls, which added 720 contracts to 3,695; inside the covered window, the September 4 $175 calls added 390 contracts on 2,369 traded.

The bigger tension is timeframe. Over roughly the past month, price is up 11.2% and the trend read is bullish; over roughly the past fifty sessions it is down 23.0% and the trend read is bearish. The near-term bounce and the bigger picture are pointing in different directions, and the last momentum crossover — on August 20 — turned down, not up. For context on what just settled: into Friday's expiration, the August 28 $170 calls traded 7,931 contracts against 9,419 open and the $165 calls another 3,619, all expiring worthless with the stock at $164.19.

Expected move

Into September 4, the straddle-implied move is about ±$8.42 (±5.13%) around $164.19. Here's how that scales out:

ExpirationImplied moveRange around $164.19
Fri, Sept 4±5.13%$155.77 – $172.61
Fri, Sept 11±7.17%$152.42 – $175.96
Fri, Sept 18±9.26%$148.99 – $179.39
Fri, Sept 25±10.82%$146.43 – $181.95

The rungs climb smoothly with no step-change between any two dates — no scheduled event is being priced inside this ladder, which is consistent with a calm curve rather than one bracing for a catalyst.

Volatility

At-the-money IV of 39.1% carries an IV rank of 21/100 — today's IV is cheaper than roughly 79% of the past year's readings — with a 52-week percentile of 44. The front-month read is unavailable today because the nearest expiration was a same-day expiry, so the usual front-versus-back comparison across expiration dates can't be computed; the ~60-day at-the-money read of 41.9% sits above the current blended 39.1%, the normal calm-market shape.

Two "vs its own norm" observations stand out — meaning unusual for QCOM specifically, not versus the broader market. First, realized movement has collapsed at the short end: the last five sessions have delivered barely half the daily movement of the past twenty, an unusually quiet stretch for this name. Second, today's call-tilted volume is well above anything typical for QCOM — a genuine one-day chase, not a drift.

Premium rich or cheap: the volatility risk premium — the gap between how much movement options are priced for and how much QCOM has actually delivered — sits at essentially zero, about 0.03 vol points. Sellers are collecting almost exactly what recent movement has cost. That reading nonetheless lands at the 66th percentile of this stock's own recent history, meaning it is richer than about two-thirds of its recent readings, because the past month sat firmly negative: as recently as August 20 the gap was roughly 8 vol points below delivered movement. The climb back to flat is mechanical — the violent late-July gap and the early-August swings are rolling out of the 20-day realized-volatility window, not a signal that traders repriced anything. Net: IV rank 21 and a premium at parity with delivered movement means credit structures collect fair, not fat, premium, and long premium isn't a bargain either. Structure selection should be driven by the levels, not by a volatility edge that isn't there.

Skew and sentiment

Skew — the fact that puts and calls the same distance from the stock price don't cost the same — has flipped against this name's habit. The 25-delta put trades at 39.9% implied volatility against 38.7% for the equivalent call: puts are about 1.2 vol points richer, while the 60-day median for QCOM is negative 1.5 vol points, i.e. calls usually carry the premium here. That's a 2.7-vol-point swing toward downside protection versus its own norm, and it is the single most directional input in our read — the one thing arguing against the call-buying.

Sentiment across expiration dates is flat. The 0–7 day bucket scores −8, the 7–30 day bucket −4, the 30–60 day bucket +3 — every bucket inside ±10, which the model labels a "Calm" regime, with the strongest 7-day-average tilt (+13 in the shortest bucket) already fading. Put another way: traders are paying up modestly for crash protection while simultaneously chasing short-dated calls, and neither impulse is large enough to define the week.

The key levels map

LevelPriceWhy it matters
50-day moving average$173.51Overhead trend resistance, 5.4% above the close
Upper implied-move rail (Sept 4)$172.61Top of the range the options market is pricing
Swing resistance$172.12Prior pivot cluster from the July breakdown
Call wall (Sept 4) & largest gamma strike$170.004,443 calls open for this expiration; 27,562 chain-wide — the heaviest call strike anywhere in the book
Swing resistance$168.87Minor pivot inside the corridor
200-day moving average$167.94First real overhead line; price is 2.2% below it
Swing resistance$165.87Nearest ceiling — the August range top
Last close$164.19Spot, anchoring every figure above and below
20-day moving average$161.80Price sits 1.5% above it — the near-term uptrend line
Swing support$161.07The August floor, tested repeatedly
Put wall & max pain (Sept 4)$160.001,454 puts open for this expiration; the strike where the most option value expires worthless
Swing support$156.48Next shelf if $160 gives way
Lower implied-move rail (Sept 4)$155.77Bottom of the priced range
Put wall (whole chain)$150.0018,403 puts open across all expirations — the book's true downside anchor
Gamma flip estimate≈ $95One rough estimate places it far below spot, implying dealer hedging dampens moves throughout this range

Worth flagging the disagreement: the September 4 expiration's own put wall is $160, while the whole chain's heaviest put strike is $150. For this week, $160 is the level that matters; $150 is where the longer-dated hedges live.

Positioning and unusual flow

The dealer-gamma estimate reads positive both for the September 4 expiration on its own and across the full chain — under the model's assumed sign convention, market makers hedging the options they've sold would be trading against moves, damping them rather than amplifying them. Treat that as an estimate built on an assumption about dealer inventory, not observed fact; it argues for chop inside the corridor rather than a clean trend.

Three live prints stand out. The September 11 $170 calls traded 5,602 contracts against just 455 open — twelve times turnover, about $1.27 million of premium — a straight bet on a push through the call wall in two weeks. The September 4 $160 calls were the single biggest dollar-premium print in the tradeable chain at roughly $2.09 million on 3,836 contracts, and the September 4 $165 calls added another $715,000. On the other side, the September 4 $150 puts added 317 contracts of open interest on 287 traded — cheap tail protection, small in dollar terms but a build nonetheless. The pattern is short-dated call chasing near the money with a thin hedge underneath.

3 · Technical check

Both technical reads lean bullish, and both stay inside the market's priced range. The 3-day model targets $165.50 by September 1 with a $161.50–$167.50 band; the 6-day model targets $166.75 by September 4 with a $159.75–$169.75 band. Their reference price of $164.20 matches the options snapshot to a penny, so there is no data-date mismatch to discount.

The supporting evidence in both write-ups is the same pair: ADX at 25.7 with positive directional movement dominant (a trend that is real but decelerating from a peak near 32), and Chaikin Money Flow at +0.149 and rising, which reads as genuine accumulation rather than short-covering. Both also flag the same brake — MACD crossed below its signal line, and price remains under both the 50-day ($173.51) and 200-day ($167.94) averages, framing this as a corrective bounce inside a larger downtrend. The dominant scenario in each report is invalidated on a close below $162.60.

Classification: Mixed. Direction leans bullish where our options read is neutral, but the targets sit comfortably inside the implied range, so the models are not arguing for anything the market hasn't already paid for. Practically, this shaded our short call strike above the technical targets rather than through them — no structure below sells calls at or under $170.

QCOM technical analysis chart, 7-day horizon

Model vs. Market: The options market implies $155.77–$172.61 into September 4; the 6-day technical model targets $166.75 inside a much tighter $159.75–$169.75. The gap isn't direction, it's width — the models expect a quiet drift higher, the options chain is still paying for a move more than twice that size in either direction.

Full technical write-ups: 3-day report → · 6-day report →

4 · Three ways the next six days can go

If QCOM pushes above the call wall ($170): that strike carries the heaviest call open interest in the entire book — 4,443 contracts for this expiration and 27,562 across all dates — and heavy call open interest overhead tends to slow rallies as hedging flows lean against the move. A clean break through it leaves comparatively thin positioning until the $172.12 swing pivot and the 50-day average at $173.51, with the $175 strike the next real shelf.

If QCOM drifts between the walls: this is the base case the positioning describes. Max pain for September 4 sits at $160, and expirations sometimes gravitate toward the strike where the most option value expires worthless. With the dealer-gamma estimate positive, hedging flows would work against extension in either direction. That combination points to chop between roughly $161 and $168 with a mild magnetic pull toward $160 into Friday.

If QCOM breaks below the put wall ($160): that's the level where this week's downside hedges are concentrated and where the swing support at $161.07 and 20-day average at $161.80 both sit just above. Below it, the chain thins quickly — the next meaningful open-interest cluster is $155, then the whole-chain put wall at $150. The gamma-flip estimate sits far below spot, so the model does not expect hedging to actively amplify a slide here; what it does expect is a vacuum of standing support between $160 and $155.

5 · Three defined-risk structures

Prices are end-of-day midpoints as of 2026-08-28. All structures are hypothetical. Verify live prices before trading — these will be stale by the open. None of these expirations spans the November 4 earnings report, so none carries earnings-gap risk.

If you expect the range to hold: Sept 4 iron condor

  • Trade: Sell the $157.50/$152.50 put spread and the $172.50/$177.50 call spread, both expiring September 4
  • Credit: $1.18 · Max profit: $118 · Max loss: $382 · Break-evens: $156.32 and $173.68
  • Why it fits: You collect premium and win if QCOM finishes anywhere between the strikes. Both short strikes sit outside the priced range rails ($155.77 and $172.61), the short call is above the $170 call wall, and the short put is below the $160 put wall and max pain. The dealer-gamma estimate is positive for this expiration, which historically coincides with contained moves.
  • Makes sense only if: you believe the last five sessions' unusually quiet realized movement continues through Friday.
  • Invalidated if: QCOM closes below $160 or above $170 — either wall breaking means the corridor thesis is done, well before your strikes are touched.
  • Managing it: close at ~50% of max credit; exit the tested side if either wall breaks on a closing basis rather than waiting for the short strike. Given the short-term trend is fighting the fifty-day trend, take profits early rather than holding for the last dime.
  • Liquidity note: the $157.50 puts quoted 93¢/$1.14 (21¢ wide) and the $172.50 calls 63¢/85¢ (22¢ wide); the wings are penny options quoted 9–21¢ wide. Slippage is the main enemy here — work the order as a package and expect to give up a dime of the credit.
  • Analyze this position →

If you lean bullish: Sept 4 $160/$155 put credit spread

  • Trade: Sell the September 4 $160 put, buy the September 4 $155 put
  • Credit: $1.17 · Max profit: $117 · Max loss: $383 · Break-even: $158.83
  • Why it fits: You collect the credit up front and keep it if QCOM stays above $160. That strike is the put wall and max pain for this expiration, the 20-day average sits just above at $161.80, and both technical models point higher inside the range. Skew is richer on the put side than this stock's own norm, so you're selling the more expensive wing.
  • Makes sense only if: you think the accumulation the technical models flag is real and $161 holds as it has all month.
  • Invalidated if: QCOM closes below $160.
  • Managing it: close at ~50% of max credit; exit regardless by Wednesday if the stock is sitting within a dollar of the short strike — gamma risk dominates theta in the final two sessions. If QCOM closes through $160, close rather than hope.
  • Liquidity note: the $160 puts traded 21¢ wide on a $1.74 mid with roughly $421,000 of premium changing hands today; the $155 puts are 12¢ wide. Both fill acceptably.
  • Analyze this position →

If you lean bearish: Sept 4 $170/$175 call credit spread

  • Trade: Sell the September 4 $170 call, buy the September 4 $175 call
  • Credit: $0.68 · Max profit: $68 · Max loss: $432 · Break-even: $170.68
  • Why it fits: You keep the credit if QCOM finishes below $170 — the heaviest call strike in the book, and the level where hedging flows have the most reason to lean against a rally. Overhead structure stacks up right behind it: the swing pivot at $172.12 and the 50-day average at $173.51. Both technical targets ($165.50 and $166.75) sit well below the short strike.
  • Makes sense only if: you accept a modest credit for a high-probability fade. The risk/reward is poor — $68 collected against $432 at risk — so this is a probability trade, not a payoff trade.
  • Invalidated if: QCOM closes above $170.
  • Managing it: take 50% of the credit if it comes quickly; with only $68 of upside, do not let a winner turn into a full loss — close on a close above the call wall. The long-term trend still points down, which is the wind at this structure's back, but the twenty-day trend does not, so keep the hold short.
  • Liquidity note: the tightest quotes in the expiration — the $170 calls 11¢ wide on a $1.17 mid ($506,000 of premium traded), the $175 calls 5¢ wide. Fills are easy.
  • Analyze this position →

If none of these: no trade

There is a real case for standing aside. IV rank is 21/100 and the premium over delivered movement is essentially zero — you are not being paid extra to sell volatility here, you are being paid exactly what recent movement cost. That percentile reading of 66 flatters the picture; it only looks rich because the prior month was genuinely cheap while the late-July gap sat inside the realized-volatility window. Meanwhile the directional inputs disagree with each other: skew says hedge, volume says chase, the twenty-day trend says up, the fifty-day trend says down. Six days is a short window in which to be right about a stock that has moved 11% in a month with no edge in the premium and no conviction in the flow. Waiting for a decisive close outside $160–$170 — and trading the break with the corridor behind you — is a perfectly good use of the week.

6 · Quick FAQ

What is QCOM's expected move this week? About ±$8.42 (±5.13%) into the September 4 expiration, per the options market's straddle pricing as of the August 28 close — a range of $155.77 to $172.61.

Is QCOM expected to go up or down over the next six days? Options positioning as of August 28 reads neutral — the leading positioning composite is flat, sentiment across expiration dates is calm, and the only one-sided input is put skew, which cuts against the day's call buying. That's a read of what traders have done, not a forecast. The actionable map is the $155.77–$172.61 range and the $160/$170 levels.

Are QCOM options expensive right now? IV rank 21/100 says option prices are lower than about 79% of the past year's readings; on top of that, they're running roughly 0.03 vol points above the movement QCOM has actually delivered — richer than about two-thirds of this stock's own recent readings, but only because the prior month sat unusually cheap. The verdict is "fair," not "rich": no strong edge in selling or owning premium this week.

Where is QCOM's biggest options support and resistance? For the September 4 expiration, the put wall is $160 (which is also max pain) and the call wall is $170. Across the whole chain, the heaviest put strike is $150 and the heaviest call strike is again $170.

What invalidates this week's read? A close below $160.


Methodology & disclosures. Data: end-of-day options-chain snapshot for QCOM, 2026-08-28, generated 2026-08-29T23:06:31.890Z. Prices shown are midpoints and will differ from live markets. Momentum/positioning scores and volatility-premium comparisons are descriptive measurements of past option flow and past price movement — not investment advice, signals, forecasts, or guarantees. Earnings dates and reported results are from the data provider's earnings feed as of 2026-08-29T23:06:31.890Z; report dates can change. All trade structures are hypothetical. Every structure shown has a defined maximum loss; you can lose the entire max-loss amount. Options involve substantial risk and are not suitable for all investors.

Back to Blog