QUBT Options Are Pricing a ±$0.90 Move Into Aug 28 — Our Flow Read Leans Lower Than the Chart
QUBT's options market implies roughly an $8.02–$9.82 band into the August 28 expiration, with max pain sitting at $9.00. Our read of the flow leans slightly bearish even as both technical models point higher — here are the levels, the tension, and three defined-risk ways to trade it.
The options market implies roughly an $8.02–$9.82 range into the August 28 expiration; here's what's driving it, where the levels sit, and three defined-risk ways to trade it.
Published Saturday, August 22, 2026 · Data as of the 2026-08-21 close
Explore the live QUBT options data in the Detailed Options Analyzer →
Quick answer
| Item | Answer |
|---|---|
| Market bias | Slightly bearish |
| Options-implied range (into Aug 28) | $8.02 – $9.82 (±10.1%) |
| Major support | $8.00 — the whole chain's heaviest put strike (26,378 contracts held open) |
| Major resistance | $10.00 — the whole chain's heaviest call strike (27,487); the Aug 28 expiration's own call wall sits far out at $12 |
| Max pain (Aug 28) | $9.00 |
| Dealer gamma regime (estimate) | Aug 28 expiration alone: positive — hedging tends to dampen moves. Whole chain combined: negative — hedging tends to amplify. Flip level ≈ $2 (a rough estimate, far below spot) |
| Volatility condition | Low and drifting — IV rank 12/100 · premium thin: options priced about 2.6 vol points below delivered movement (distorted by the August 10 report sitting inside the realized-vol window) |
| Technical check | Diverges (bullish, 3-day and 6-day horizons) |
| Best-fitting strategy | Long put debit spread (Aug 28 $8.50/$7.50), defined risk |
| Analysis invalidated if | QUBT closes above $9.31 |
1 · What matters today
QUBT closed Friday at $8.92 after a violent week: down about 9.5% over five sessions, then a sharp snap-back on Thursday and Friday. Our read of the options flow leans slightly bearish into the August 28 expiration — driven mostly by how expensive puts have gotten relative to calls and by a leading positioning read that has swung hard negative in the last three sessions. The options market is pricing roughly a ±$0.90 move over the next six days, an $8.02–$9.82 band. The gravity point for that expiration is $9.00, which is also where max pain sits — the price where the most option value would expire worthless. Both technical models we checked point the other way, targeting about $9.15. That disagreement is the story. A close above $9.31 kills the bearish lean outright.
2 · What the options market is pricing
What changed this week
Price did most of the moving. QUBT is down 9.45% over the trailing five sessions but still up 9.12% over twenty — a round trip, not a trend. Implied volatility — the market's estimate of how much QUBT will move, baked into option prices — sits at 72.6% at the money, up almost 16% in a single day but down nearly 20% over the past month and well below both its 30-day average (89.9%) and its 90-day average (98.3%). In other words, Friday's jump in option prices was a bounce off genuinely depressed levels, not a fear spike.
Where the money actually leaned: put volume ran at 0.50 puts for every call, against a seven-day average of 0.34 — a clear pickup in put activity on a quiet tape (total option volume was only 0.70× its 20-day average). Open interest tells a slower, opposite story: the put/call open-interest ratio has slipped from 0.62 to 0.59 over five days, and sits below its 14-day average of 0.64, meaning contracts held open have been thinning on the put side even as fresh put trading picked up. The snapshot showed no measurable day-over-day change in open interest anywhere in the chain, so there is no new-positioning story to tell from that column today.
One more thing worth naming: the short- and long-term trend reads point in different directions. Over the past week, price and flow are both bearish (price −9.5%); over the past month they are bullish (+9.1%); over the past two-and-a-half months they are bearish again (−13.9%). A momentum crossover on August 19 turned the near-term read back down. This is a chop pattern, not a directional regime — and it argues for shorter-dated structures and earlier profit-taking rather than anything you have to sit in.
Expected move
The expected move is the move the options market is pricing in — derived from what straddles cost. For the August 28 expiration, the call and put sides of the at-the-money strike disagreed too much for that rung to be priced cleanly, so we scale the chain's overall 72.6% at-the-money implied volatility to seven days: ±10.1%, or about ±$0.90, an $8.02–$9.82 band around Friday's close.
| Expiration | Implied move | Range around $8.92 |
|---|---|---|
| Fri, Aug 28 (derived) | ±10.1% | $8.02 – $9.82 |
| Fri, Sep 4 | ±16.0% | $7.49 – $10.35 |
| Fri, Sep 11 | ±17.7% | $7.34 – $10.50 |
| Fri, Sep 18 | ±20.3% | $7.11 – $10.73 |
The rungs widen roughly with the square root of time and show no step-up anywhere — there is no scheduled-event hump priced into this ladder. One housekeeping note that matters for the arithmetic: the options-chain snapshot recorded the underlying at $8.14 while the official daily close printed $8.92. That is a vendor-timing artifact, not an error, and it is why every strike, wall, and max-pain figure below is measured against the $8.14 chain print while the ranges above are quoted from the official close. If you prefer to anchor everything to the chain print, shift each band down by about 9% (the six-day band becomes $7.32–$8.96).
Volatility
At-the-money implied volatility of 72.6% sounds enormous until you measure it against this stock's own history: IV rank is 12/100, meaning option prices are cheaper than 88% of the past year's readings, and today's level sits below roughly 98% of the past year's daily prints. That is the low end of QUBT's range, not the middle. The term structure — comparing option prices across expiration dates — is inverted: front-month IV is running 6.9 vol points above the 60-day tenor, which usually shows up around stress or an event rather than in calm markets.
Two "vs its own norm" readings are worth flagging, both non-directional. Twenty-day realized volatility of 75.3% is actually below this stock's own recent norm — 75% annualized is a quiet month for QUBT. But the five-day-over-twenty-day realized-vol ratio is 1.22 and unusually high for this name: movement has been accelerating into the last week even though the monthly average is subdued.
Premium rich or cheap: the volatility risk premium — the gap between how much movement options are priced for and how much QUBT has actually delivered — is currently negative by about 2.6 vol points. Option sellers have been collecting less than realized movement has cost them. That gap sits at the 37th percentile versus this stock's own recent readings, meaning it is thinner than roughly two-thirds of them, and it flipped from clearly positive (over 15 vol points rich in late July, briefly 46 points on August 7) to negative around August 17. Here is the caveat that matters: the August 10 earnings report and its aftermath sit inside the 20-day realized-volatility window, mechanically inflating the realized leg — so this negative reading is not a clean "options are a bargain" signal, and the sign flip is a calendar artifact as much as a market judgment. What survives the caveat is the IV-rank read: at 12/100, this is not a week where selling premium is well paid, and it is a reasonable week to own optionality if you want directional exposure.
Skew and sentiment
This is the loudest number in the file. Skew measures the fact that puts and calls the same distance from the stock price don't cost the same — when puts are pricier, traders are paying up for crash protection. QUBT's 25-delta puts are currently priced 25.0 vol points above the equivalent calls (96.6% versus 71.7%), against a 60-day median of puts running 10.1 points below calls. That is a 35-point swing from this stock's own norm, and it is the single most stretched reading in the data — unusually steep even by QUBT's volatile standards. The steepening happened fast: about 15 vol points over five sessions.
Sentiment in short-dated options is genuinely mixed rather than uniformly bearish. The 0–7-day bucket reads mildly positive (+6), the 7–30-day bucket negative (−20), the 30–60-day bucket clearly negative (−45), and the 60–120-day bucket positive (+25). One week ago the near-dated buckets were averaging solidly positive, so the front of the curve has cooled. On the other side of the ledger, four call contracts cleared the unusual-volume bar against just one put — call-side sweeps still dominate the peer-relative flow. Traders are paying up for downside protection while still nibbling at upside lottery tickets; that combination is why the composite lands "slightly bearish" rather than outright bearish.
The key levels map
| Level | Price | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Call wall (Aug 28) | $12.00 | Heaviest call open interest at the target expiration (4,153 contracts) — so far above spot it barely constrains this week |
| Swing resistance | $10.53 / $11.30 | Prior pivot cluster from the daily price feed |
| Call wall (whole chain) | $10.00 | The chain's heaviest call strike across all expirations (27,487) and the second-largest gamma pile — the functional ceiling for a six-day view |
| 200-day moving average | $9.71 | Close sits 8.1% below it; the longer-term trend is still down |
| Swing resistance | $9.31 | The invalidation line for this week's read |
| Swing resistance | $9.10 | Mid-August rejection shelf |
| Max pain (Aug 28) | $9.00 | Where the most option value expires worthless; also the third-largest gamma strike and the most-traded call in the expiration |
| Last close | $8.92 | Friday's official close from the daily feed |
| 50-day moving average | $8.88 | Price just reclaimed it |
| Swing support | $8.83 | Nearest pivot support below the close |
| 20-day moving average | $8.58 | Close sits 3.9% above it |
| Swing support | $8.48 / $8.26 | The zone the stock bounced from last week |
| Chain snapshot price | $8.14 | The underlying print recorded with the options snapshot — the anchor for every wall and max-pain figure here |
| Put wall (whole chain) | $8.00 | The chain's heaviest put strike (26,378) and the largest total-gamma strike on the board — the most important floor in the file |
| Swing support | $7.41 | Thin positioning between here and $8.00 |
| 52-week low / Aug 28 put wall | $6.18 / $6.00 | The target expiration's own heaviest put strike (2,257) sits at the 52-week low area |
| Gamma flip (estimate) | ≈ $2.00 | One rough estimate of the level below which market-maker hedging would amplify selling — far below spot, so it is not a live risk this week |
The two wall reads disagree, and it is worth saying plainly: the August 28 expiration's own corridor runs from a $6 put wall to a $12 call wall — so wide that it constrains nothing over six days. The whole chain combined puts the heaviest call OI at $10 and the heaviest put OI at $8. For this window, the useful map is the $8/$10 pair plus the $9.00 max-pain shelf sitting almost exactly at Friday's close.
Positioning and unusual flow
Market makers hedge the options they've sold, and the direction of that hedging depends on their net position. Scoped to the August 28 expiration alone, one rough estimate puts dealers in positive gamma — hedging that tends to dampen moves and pull price toward the biggest open-interest strikes. Aggregated across all ten expirations in the chain, the same estimate flips negative, driven by the enormous far-dated put open interest (17,291 contracts at the October 16 $8 strike alone). For a six-day trade, the per-expiration read is the relevant one: it argues for a grind toward $9 rather than a directional cascade. Treat both as estimates built on an assumed dealer convention, not observed inventory.
Three flow items stand out, none of them in expired contracts. The single largest dollar-premium trade of the day was in puts: 2,033 contracts of the October 16 $9 put changed hands for roughly $260,000 in premium — by a wide margin the biggest money print in the chain, and it is downside. Second, the November 20 $6 put traded 701 contracts against 282 held open — a turnover ratio of 2.5, meaning the day's volume was two-and-a-half times the entire existing position, which is how a new hedge looks. Third, inside the target expiration itself, the $9 call was the busiest contract: 520 contracts against 985 open, trading nine-to-ten cents wide. Big money bought protection; small money bought the $9 strike.
3 · Technical check
Both technical models we pulled read bullish, and both diverge from the options bias. The 3-day model (target date August 25) targets $9.12 with a $8.62–$9.22 range. The 6-day model, which lands exactly on the August 28 expiration, targets $9.15 with a $8.55–$9.35 range. The two most decisive reads behind them: a fresh MACD crossover on August 21 paired with a trend-strength gauge (ADX) at 32.5 with the positive directional line decisively above the negative one, and a money-flow measure that flipped from −0.20 to +0.21 in a single session — one of the sharpest accumulation reversals in the dataset. Both reports also concede the larger picture: price is still well below its 200-day average, so this is a counter-trend bounce, not a confirmed reversal.
Both technical reports use $8.92 as their reference price, which matches the official daily close but is about 9% above the $8.14 print recorded with the options snapshot — a data-date mismatch worth keeping in mind when comparing the two sets of numbers. Classification: diverges on direction, confirms on magnitude. The technical targets sit comfortably inside the options-implied band, so the disagreement is about which side of $9 the week resolves on, not about how far it travels.
Model vs. Market: The options market implies $8.02–$9.82 into August 28 with its gravity point at $9.00; the 6-day technical model targets $9.15 and calls a sustained close above $9.05 the bullish confirmation. Between those two sits a two-percent window — which is exactly why every structure below is defined-risk and why the $9.31 line, not a gut feel, is the kill switch.

The technical read did shift strike selection: it is why the bearish structure below is built out of the money rather than at the money, and why the bullish alternative is anchored at $9 rather than higher.
Full technical write-ups: 3-day report → · 6-day report →
4 · Three ways the next six days can go
If QUBT pushes above $9.31 and toward the call wall ($10.00): the heaviest call open interest across the chain sits at $10, and strikes that crowded tend to slow rallies as hedging flows lean against the move. Above $9.31 the next real obstacles are the 200-day average at $9.71 and then the wall itself; a clean break through $10 leaves comparatively thin positioning until $10.53. This branch also invalidates the bearish read outright.
If QUBT drifts between $8.00 and $10.00: this is the base case the positioning describes. Max pain for August 28 is $9.00 — a hair above Friday's close — and the per-expiration dealer-gamma estimate is positive, meaning hedging in that expiration tends to dampen rather than extend moves. Expirations don't always gravitate toward max pain, but when the level sits inside the expected-move band and the hedging estimate points the same way, a grinding, range-bound week into Friday is the path of least resistance.
If QUBT breaks below the $8.00 put wall: that strike carries both the largest put open interest (26,378 contracts) and the largest total gamma on the board, so it should act as a shelf first and an accelerant second. Below it, positioning thins out quickly toward the $7.41 swing support. One thing that does not support a cascade: the gamma flip estimate sits around $2, and spot is unusually far above it for this name — by that rough estimate, the regime where market-maker hedging amplifies selling is nowhere near in play this week.
5 · Three defined-risk structures
Prices are end-of-day midpoints as of 2026-08-21. All structures are hypothetical. Verify live prices before trading — and note carefully that these mids were struck against an $8.14 underlying print while the official close was $8.92, so puts will fill cheaper and calls dearer than the figures below. Re-price every leg before you commit.
Premium is thin rather than rich this week, so debit structures lead the list.
If you lean bearish (the base case): Aug 28 $8.50/$7.50 put debit spread
- Trade: Buy the Aug 28 $8.50 put, sell the Aug 28 $7.50 put. You pay a debit up front and profit if QUBT falls; both your cost and your maximum gain are fixed on day one.
- Debit: $0.50 ($50 per spread) · Max profit: $0.50 ($50) · Max loss: $0.50 ($50) · Break-even: $8.00 at expiration
- Why it fits: it expresses the slightly bearish flow read without paying for rich premium — IV rank at 12/100 means you're buying options cheaper than 88% of the past year's prints. Maximum value lands at $7.50, roughly one implied-move unit below the close, and break-even sits at $8.00, exactly the chain's heaviest put strike. With the near-term trend fighting the one-month bounce, this is deliberately a short-dated expression.
- Makes sense only if: you believe the $9.00 max-pain shelf caps the bounce and the stretched put skew is signalling real demand rather than one large hedge.
- Invalidated if: QUBT closes above $9.31. A close above $9.05 is the technical models' own bullish trigger, so treat that as an early warning.
- Managing it: take profits at roughly 60–70% of maximum value rather than waiting for expiration pin risk; if the position is flat or worse at the Tuesday, August 25 checkpoint, close it — a six-day debit spread that hasn't moved by the halfway mark is decaying against you.
- Liquidity note: the $8.50 puts traded 51¢/66¢ (15¢ wide) on 168 contracts today; the $7.50 puts quoted 7¢/10¢. Those are wide spreads in percentage terms — work limit orders at the mid and expect to give up a few cents, which is real money on a 50¢ debit.
- Analyze this position →
If you lean bullish (the technical case): Aug 28 $9/$10 call debit spread
- Trade: Buy the Aug 28 $9 call, sell the Aug 28 $10 call.
- Debit: $0.065 ($6.50 at snapshot mids) · Max profit: $0.935 ($93.50) · Max loss: $6.50 · Break-even: $9.07
- Why it fits: it takes the side both technical models argue for, and it caps out precisely at the chain's heaviest call strike — the level where overhead open interest would most likely stall a rally anyway. The $9 call is also the most active contract in the expiration (520 contracts, about $16,900 of premium) and the tightest-quoted leg on the board. Read the pricing carefully: those mids were struck against an $8.14 underlying, where the $9 call was far out of the money; against Friday's $8.92 close the debit will be several times higher, which raises break-even and compresses the reward. Re-price before entering — the risk/reward printed here is not the risk/reward you will get.
- Makes sense only if: you read Friday's reversal as the start of continuation rather than a bounce inside a downtrend, and you're willing to be wrong for a fixed, small amount.
- Invalidated if: QUBT closes below $8.60 — the moving-average cluster both technical reports name as their support.
- Managing it: with the near-term trend fighting a still-negative two-month trend, take profits early rather than holding for the full spread width; scale out into any push through $9.31.
- Liquidity note: the $9 calls traded 9¢/10¢ — the tightest market in the expiration. The $10 calls quoted 2¢/4¢ on 327 contracts, thinner but workable.
- Analyze this position →
If you expect the range to hold: Aug 28 $7/$8 – $10/$11 iron condor
- Trade: Sell the Aug 28 $8 put and buy the $7 put; sell the Aug 28 $10 call and buy the $11 call. You collect a credit up front and keep it if QUBT finishes between the short strikes.
- Credit: $0.10 ($10 per condor) · Max profit: $10 · Max loss: $90 · Break-evens: $7.90 and $10.10
- Why it fits — and the health warning: the short strikes are the two heaviest open-interest walls in the chain, and both sit outside the implied move, so the structural logic is sound. The pricing is not. You'd be selling premium that hasn't been rich lately — IV rank is 12/100 and the gap between priced and delivered movement is currently negative. Ten dollars of credit against ninety dollars of risk is a poor trade-off no matter how wide the wings look.
- Makes sense only if: you can fill materially better than the quoted mids and you genuinely expect a dead week into expiration.
- Invalidated if: QUBT closes outside $8.00–$10.00 with time left on the clock.
- Managing it: close at 50% of the credit — which on a 10¢ credit means five cents, an amount the bid-ask will consume. That arithmetic is the argument against the trade.
- Liquidity note: the $8 puts quoted 7¢/30¢ and the $11 calls 1¢/2¢. Slippage alone could eat the entire credit; if you can't fill near the mid on all four legs, don't force it.
- Analyze this position →
If none of these: no trade
Standing aside is defensible this week, and the condor above shows why. Premium is not rich — option prices sit at the low end of their own yearly range and below what the stock has actually delivered — so the income case is weak before you even account for bid-ask spreads that run 15% to 60% of mid across most of the August 28 board. On the directional side, our flow read and both technical models point opposite ways, and the price gap between the chain snapshot and the official close means every quoted mid here needs re-verification before it means anything. If you can't get filled near the midpoint, or you can't watch the $9.31 line, the honest answer is to wait for the next snapshot.
6 · Quick FAQ
What is QUBT's expected move this week? About ±10.1%, or ±$0.90 — an $8.02–$9.82 range into the August 28 expiration, derived from the chain's at-the-money implied volatility as of the August 21 close. The August 28 rung's own quotes were too poor to price directly.
Is QUBT expected to go up or down over the next six days? Options positioning as of August 21 leans slightly bearish — puts are running 25 vol points over calls against a norm of 10 points under, and the leading positioning read has swung sharply negative — but that is a description of what traders have already done, not a forecast. The actionable map is the $8.02–$9.82 range plus the $8.00 and $10.00 walls, with $9.00 as the expiration's gravity point.
Are QUBT options expensive right now? No. IV rank of 12/100 says option prices are lower than 88% of the past year's readings, and on top of that they're running about 2.6 vol points below the movement QUBT has actually delivered — thinner than roughly two-thirds of this stock's own recent readings. That favors owning premium over selling it, with one caveat: the August 10 earnings report still sits inside the 20-day realized-volatility window, which inflates the delivered-movement side of that comparison.
Where is QUBT's biggest options support and resistance? Across the whole chain, the put wall is $8.00 (26,378 contracts) and the call wall is $10.00 (27,487). Scoped to the August 28 expiration alone, the walls sit far apart at $6.00 and $12.00 — too wide to constrain a six-day move, which is why the whole-chain pair is the more useful map.
What invalidates this week's read? A close above $9.31. That clears the last swing resistance below the 200-day average and puts the $10 call wall in play, at which point the slightly bearish lean is simply wrong.
Methodology & disclosures. Data: end-of-day options-chain snapshot for QUBT, 2026-08-21, generated 2026-08-22T11:41:50Z. Prices shown are midpoints and will differ from live markets. Momentum/positioning scores and volatility-premium comparisons are descriptive measurements of past option flow and past price movement — not investment advice, signals, forecasts, or guarantees. Earnings dates and reported results are from the data provider's earnings feed as of 2026-08-22T11:41:50Z; report dates can change. All trade structures are hypothetical. Every structure shown has a defined maximum loss; you can lose the entire max-loss amount. Options involve substantial risk and are not suitable for all investors.